Yes, we can…?

http://www.ijreview.com/2012/09/16780-obama-you-cant-change-washington-from-inside/

I’m sure there is more meaning to his words, a truer, deeper meaning, that my pea-brain can’t comprehend… but Obama seriously said “You can’t change Washington from the inside.”

So in 4 years he’s gone from “Yes, we can” to “No, I can’t.”  Honestly though – there may be some truth to what he said… He can’t really change Washington… but the country and the world can undeniably be changed.  Unemployment numbers that only drop when people stop looking for work, national debt soaring past $16,000,000,000,000.00, government control of industry, you name it.  All that change… all from Obama.

I tell ya, if Obama wins, I don’t know how he’s going to recover from the damage left behind by the previous term.  Will anyone seriously be able to blame Bush if after another 4 years nothing has improved?  Eventually, responsibility needs to be taken by, and blame assigned to – the people who voted for Obama.

Washington can be changed, as was proven in 2010 when the Democrats lost control of the House.  We’re talking a classic David and Goliath tale here and as much as I’d love to vote for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate, I don’t see that he has a snowballs chance in hell of winning.  I’m not even sure of Romney/Ryan will be able to trigger the change that is required, all I know is that Obama and the current Democrat leadership needs to go.  As fucked up as the move during the RNC to keep the Libertarian movement off the state was… someone somewhere calculated that the only candidate threatened by a strong Libertarian voice on the national state was Romney.  As much as I support the ideas and proposals from Johnson and Paul – the only way to defeat a force like Obama with his absolutely dismal record – is with big names and big money.

I would LOVE to see more attention on the Libertarians.  I would LOVE to see a candidate that has a real chance to reach the presidency… But to do that they need to exponentially increase their efforts and get their message out by any means necessary… it’s going to take an unstoppable force to face the seemingly immovable object that is the political establishment in Washington – and IMHO – they simply aren’t there yet.  The best time for them will be in challenging a Republican incumbent, not a Democrat, and most certainly not Barack Obama.

We can change Washington, the country, and the world – perhaps even for the better – for now, I’ll have to settle for Romney/Ryan.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Feds indict “information activist” for violating “terms of service”…

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/09/feds-go-overboard-in-prosecuting-information-activist/

So apparently this bright yet misguided ‘information activist’ decided to download as many academic documents as he could from JSTOR with a plan to upload them to a P2P network.  The catch here is that JSTOR provides free access to academic networks (Schools, Colleges, etc…) but someone who wants to read this content and doesn’t have access to an academic network has to pay.

Personally – I don’t see the big deal here as far as offering free access to educational institutions and pay access to everyone else.  It’s a valid business model that I’ve seen used over the years in schools and libraries alike.  It encourages folks like myself to visit the library if we want to access the data without paying.  Now of course, JSTOR had a ‘terms of service’ which this gent clearly used as a replacement for his ivy-league two ply.

He went as far as downloading as many as possible until the college blocked his IP.  He then changed his MAC address (FYI www.google.com is a DOMAIN, 173.194.73.99 is an IP address, and the MAC address looks like 00:12:34:56:AB) which is the unique set of numbers/letters that identified his laptop on the college network so that he could regain access and download more.  Lastly he just walked in to a network closet at the college (where all the black boxes with blinking lights that make the internet work exist) plugged in his laptop, and left it for a bit to download on its own.  He knew what he was doing, and he knew what he was doing could get him in trouble since he hid his face from security cameras when placing/retrieving his laptop.

Eventually JSTOR blocked all access to its service for several days from the campus until they could figure out a way to keep him out, and according to an indictment his laptop was seized before he could upload the files.  While I personally believe that information SHOULD be free, for the time being – if you want certain flavors of information for free, you have to play by the rules or pony up the cash.  By Massachusetts (where he physically committed the crime) law, he committed an electronic trespass which carries with it a $100 fine and 30 days in jail if convicted.  The folks at ARS are viewing this as a victimless crime and more of an indictment of the Federal Government for misusing an anti-hacking law passed in 1986 as well as of the market for academic documents.

Here’s the problem as I see it…  First, while his goal may appear altruistic – he used some black hat (bad guy hacker) methods to accomplish it.  Second, his actions caused an entire college campus to lose access to JSTOR for a period of time (which kept ordinary students from being able to use it).  Lofty goals aside, if I had a paper due which required information from JSTOR, and I couldn’t access it because some idealistic twit wanted to prove a point – I don’t care about his goals or intentions – he just fucked me like when that Frosh tripped over the main power cable while an entire classroom was working on their theses in PCU…

As far as the Federal Government getting involved, there have been cases of them using the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) to prosecute people who have violated the terms of service of a website before… that I think is a stretch.  The ‘terms of service’ in the simplest sense is a written agreement between a service provider and the people who use the service.  Violating it gives service provider the right to terminate your ability to use the service.  The Fed is saying that by accessing a service in violation of their terms, you’re also violating the CFAA which could land you in prison for decades.  That’s a stretch to say the least, and in my opinion the best thing they could possibly do at this point is drop it and allow the state to prosecute the case.  JSTOR didn’t involve the Feds, neither did MIT.  They apparently did it all on their own, and in the wake of Wikileaks as well as the constant stream of national security leaks from the current administration, they’re probably feeling like the receiving end of prison sex.

From the point of view of someone who works in the IT industry, I think the biggest questions that should be asked are:

  • How did a student get direct access to a network closet at a major university?
  • Why doesn’t JSTOR have anything in place to limit the rate at which a user can download content?

I’ve seen both sides of the spectrum as far as securing physical resources is concerned…  Some places simply don’t restrict access to sensitive equipment, which is completely retarded, and by proxy – MIT *should* be held accountable for its role in not preventing the access to its network hardware.  Whether the guy will face any repercussions from that tresspass beyond the confines of Massachusetts law, I don’t know… but if i was in charge of their IT, heads would roll.

JSTOR could have easily implemented controls to limit access to its resources, again if I was in charge of IT there – heads would roll.

Beyond the possibility of an interstate crime being committed, the Fed really has no place in this equation… but they’re going to do their best to make an example out of this guy and in the process prove just how outdated their policies are as well as reinforce the pattern of stomping on the states to achieve its goals by any means necessary.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

You know…

Just a followup thought to my last post regarding Romney’s commentary on the 47% of Americans who he considers ‘locked in’ when it comes to voting for Obama…  Now the message of Conservatism really hasn’t changed over the years… Small government, free enterprise, capitalism, individual liberty…. all tenets of Conservatism.  Looking back at the past 12 years, we really haven’t had a chance to see Conservatism in action.  Sure, Bush had his tax cuts but he also set forth a wave of government spending that was only topped by Obama.  You’ve got 12 years of big government, big spending, 8.1% unemployment, 16 trillion dollars of debt, no real solution from the Democrats… but then you’ve got this tiny little voice in the corner talking about Conservatism… Americans uniting under a ‘tea party’ banner and undeniably changing the course of politics…  At no time in history has our nation been this close to collapse.  At no time in history have this many Americans been dependent on government handouts.  47% of our nation’s 300+ million population are receiving government entitlements.

That 47% is an absolute wildcard here.  5-10% of ‘independents’?  No, you’ve got 57% of independents.  I want to believe that the majority of us aren’t trapped in an entitlement mentality.  I want to believe that most Americans want change, but more than that they want to have the opportunity to rise above the chains of entitlement and dependency.  I want to believe that America HAS been driven to its breaking point, that something has got to give, and that in the end when given the choice to guarantee 4 more years of government benefits or taking a chance on something better than what is being GIVEN… Americans en mass will choose the latter.

If that’s the case… November may just be a landslide for Romney.  I’m not saying he’s the cure all, not even that he is the ideal candidate, but he’s a step in the right direction, and make no mistake…  there are 47% of Americans who are paying attention and if that 47% decides to ‘give work a chance’ – Obama’s fucked.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

You say gaffe, I say “no shit?”

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2012/09/17/nbc-s-williams-jumps-highlight-surreptitiously-recorded-romney-comments

On the way in today, in my pre-caffeinated state I heard Don Imus ranting over a comment Romney made yesterday, implying that ‘he doesn’t care about the 47% of Americans who are going to vote for Obama.’  I felt a thrill go up my leg, the same one I get any time I can sense the mainstream media trying to spin a valid statement made by someone who is not a Democrat into a gaffe that Romney can be attacked for.

Now I’m used to Libs having to ‘restate’ something said by Obama or Biden because the rest of us are simply too stupid to understand the true meaning behind their comments.  For that reason alone, I refuse to re-state what Romney said:

“There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the President no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that’s an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what… And I mean the President starts off with 47 percent, 48, 49 – he starts off with a huge number. These are people who pay no income tax. 47 percent of Americans pay no income tax. So our message of low taxes doesn’t connect. So he’ll be out there talking about tax cuts for the rich. I mean, that’s what they sell every four years. And so my job is not to worry about these people. I’ll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.

What I have to do is to convince the five to ten percent in the center that are independents, that are thoughtful, that look at voting one way or the other depending upon, in some cases, emotion, whether they like the guy or not.”

Ok – so where’s the problem here?  Romney is acknowledging that Obama’s biggest voting block is a group of Americans who pay no income taxes and are entitled to being looked after by big government.  The guy was speaking plain English, and in my mind – making perfect sense.

I think that most Conservatives would agree here – that the entitlement mentality that got Obama into office can’t be cracked by offering income tax cuts – they don’t pay any.  That mentality can’t be cracked by talk of cutting entitlements – they depend on them.  That 47% for all intents and purposes will vote for whoever promises to give them the most (whether or not they actually deliver on the promises).  So by that statement, Romney is going to focus on the other 53% who do pay income taxes which includes the ‘5-10%’ of independents who can go either way and may vote for an emotional reason instead of a logical one.

I’m not restating anything here, I’m quoting what he said and giving you my thoughts on it.  See folks, I’m one of those people who believes that instead of the Government redistributing wealth and driving our nations debt to record levels by granting more and more entitlements to Americans (who may be perfectly capable of entitling THEMSELVES), I believe in PEOPLE redistributing wealth.  I believe that when I go out and pay for goods or services, I am actively redistributing my wealth to those who I believe have EARNED it.

Obama’s last great hope for re-election is that he can increase the entitlement mentality which got him elected enough so that the ideas of freedom, free enterprise, and personal responsibility will fall on deaf ears because the majority of Americans are so happy driving in their government subsidized Chevrolet after filling up the tank using unemployment benefits on the way to the local supermarket where they can spend their food stamps on a big ‘ol brick of Velveeta.

Are there people who actually need help, who can’t help themselves?  Absolutely.  Should the Government be in charge of helping them?  I don’t think so.  See, one of the major goals of any business is to make money and to grow.  The business makes money and grows by providing goods and services that people want to buy.  The benefit of a business being profitable and growing is that it allows them to improve their products, grow their markets, create new jobs, and find new ways to reach out to their customers and perpetuate the cycle.  The problem here is that Government wants to act like a business.  It wants to provide goods and services to consumers.  As the Government redistributes more wealth, it increases the number of consumers who use its products, which makes it grow and expand to keep up with demand.  Since the Government doesn’t actually produce anything, and people can’t voluntarily buy anything as they would with a normal business, the Government increases taxes on income, goods, and services in order to support its growth.  There is no benefit to government growth.  The only thing that happens as government grows bigger is that it consumes more of our money against our will, restricts our rights and freedoms more to allow itself to grow, and slowly but surely convinces us (like Apple with the iPhone) that we NEED their products.

The punch line is that while buying an iPhone will hollow out your wallet, buying into big government and its entitlements will hollow out your future.  We don’t NEED entitlements, we don’t NEED a new iPhone, but for some percentage of our population, having them makes them all warm and fuzzy inside until some evil Republican carrying a Google Nexus says “Are we all better off than we were $8 trillion dollars ago?”

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Don’t blame the cops, blame the sytem, I do.

NYPD officer canned for ticketing dead people says he was doing it to meet ‘quotas’

Now generally speaking, I don’t have a problem with law enforcement.  I’ve had my own run ins, pretty much all traffic related… Some ended in my favor, others didn’t.  I mainly do my best to ‘blend in’ and make it easier for someone else to fill the officer’s quota.

Lets get this out in the open – I have friends in the NY State Police, local departments, as well as the NYPD.

The one thing I have learned from talking to all of them – is that quotas DO exist.  You will rarely hear ANYONE admit to them, but simple logic proves that they do.  All people commit crimes, from driving 1 mph over the posted limit to pocketing some Juicy Fruit at the local gas station on a dare.  We’re fish in a barrel – and law enforcement has an endless clip.

The important question is: Why are there quotas?

The logical answer: If a police officer doesn’t catch anyone committing a crime, they aren’t doing their job.

The real-world answer: Traffic tickets are extremely profitable, and most government entities cannot fully fund law enforcement simply on tax revenue.

The root cause of quotas is the high cost of law enforcement.  This is why you can drive past a speed trap doing 5mph in one town and besides a moment of panic – get where you’re going without incident where in other towns that 5mph will get you a ticket and a court date.  Speed traps, meter maids, these folks are the public face of the biggest armed collection agency on the planet.  Whether you pay the fine outright or go to court and make a deal for a lower fine – either way you pay.

Now in a perfect world – the money collected from cops doing their job would be spent on cops.  In reality though – I’d be astonished if that was the case, and the seemingly endless cashflow was never used to support other aspects of government.  However – every business (including government) has a budget, and when creating that budget you want to estimate the revenue that’s coming in to support your expenses.  You can’t have revenue from law enforcement unless they write tickets, and you can’t estimate how much revenue there will be UNLESS YOU SET A QUOTA TO MEET THE MINIMUM REVENUE REQUIREMENTS.

Personally – I want cops to have the best equipment available and be able to support themselves and their families financially… so the one I depend on for help will be able to get to me as fast as possible with a clear head.  I’d also like to be able to believe that the reason I’m being stopped has more to do with law enforcement than shoring up a budget shortfall.

As far as the article in this link – it’s readily apparent that while the officer implicated was doing his job well, he wasn’t doing it well enough to satisfy the accountants at city hall.  Firing an officer because the bloated and inefficient system he works for required him to violate his ethics to the point he decided to violate the system’s ethics instead – should be a wake up call to all of us that something has got to change.

I’d rather have an officer sitting there for a shift and only write 1 ticket for the ditsy blonde trying to text her boyfriend while applying lipstick instead of wasting his or her time stopping every single person who is driving in a straight line a few mph over the limit with a cellphone strapped to their head… but as long as the big initiatives in NYC have more to do with the eating and drinking habits of its citizens than their real physical safety – this will only continue to get more ridiculous.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A VPN is only as good as its endpoints…

There’s a big push lately for everyone to utilize VPN’s. For quite some time, VPN’s have been used to connect individual computers or networks to another networks across the Internet securely. In the most basic of explanations – a VPN (Virtual Private Network) forces all of the information leaving your computer for a specific destination to be encrypted.

Businesses have relied on them for years – but more recently services have been popping up all across the fruited plains offering mobile users the same level of security when it comes to browsing the web, transferring files, checking email, you name it.

Here’s the problem I have with these services… You’ve just set up your laptop to use a free VPN provider, or plunked down your heard earned dollars for the service… All the information that’s going to and from your laptop is now encrypted by a bunch of different acronyms which you don’t recognize, and you think your data and privacy are now free from prying eyes.

The thing is – how secure are you REALLY? If you’re a computer nerd like myself – your laptop is free of spyware and other naughty bytes that’ll sail clear through the VPN… and the system at the other end is also clean and secure. One thing I’ve learned in all of my years in the industry though – is that no setup is ever as clean or secure as you would like it to be.

I advise anyone planning to use a VPN – be aware of what it is, and that just because your information will be encrypted and secure as it passes from point A to point B and back again – that it is no excuse for *not* keeping your system up to date and free of spyware, viruses, and other security exploits. It is also no excuse for expecting that your information as it passes from point B to points unknown is still secure.

I use a VPN I set up on my home network as an added level of security between my laptop, iPad, or Droid while I’m out and about – to make it a little harder for those prying eyes to see what I’m up to. I don’t expect it to be the holy grail of public Internet communication, nor do I use it as an excuse to justify slacking off when it comes to performing my due diligence as a card carrying member of the information age.

Use strong passwords, keep your security software up to date, and don’t ever assume that you’re truly anonymous or secure… that’s when you’ll get in trouble.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

There are 23,000,000 reasons to get off your ass today.

So yesterday I made a pretty passionate post about the treatment of Ron Paul and his delegates at the RNC, and the extraordinary lengths the Republican establishment took to disenfranchise him.  I went as far as saying I would cast my vote for Obama in November if the absurdity didn’t get some real attention from the VIP’s of the current Republican party.  Hindsight being 20/20, I’ll admit I couldn’t in good conscience cast a vote for the current President’s re-election bid.  That left me to question though – what is there for an American like myself to do?

I can stand beside the current Republican platform in its entirety, I’m a lifelong Conservative like my father before me.  I’m not sure where my grandparents stood on political issues, they weren’t alive to tell me.  On my father’s side, his parents died comparatively young – he grew up in an orphanage – and stepped out into the world with a fierce work ethic, and a belief that anything was possible, anything was achievable, as long as you worked hard enough to earn it.  That’s the biggest thing I took away from growing up in my family.  Anything was possible if you were willing to work hard enough to achieve it.

There is never going to be a perfect President.  They will always have flaws.  As far gone as our country has become, its constant shift from Left to Right and back again has kept us moving forward while the people stand back and watch.  Some of us get involved, devoting our time and effort into a specific candidate or ideaology, putting all of our hopes and dreams onto the shoulders of one person that isn’t ourselves, and then have the audacity to write them off when they couldn’t do what we were not willing to do ourselves.

It’s easy to redirect our hopes and dreams on another… to mistakenly shed the weight of our world onto their shoulders and cry foul when they don’t live up to expectations.  The current administration strolled into power on a wave of hope, change, and empty promises to a society that has put more value in instant gratification than in the value of hard work and its rewards.  People are so hell bent on the promise of what could be – that they’ll willingly blind themselves to reality and vehemently defend the one who made the promise instead of getting off their fat, lazy, self-entitled asses and fulfilling the promise themselves.

With 23 million Americans out of work, is it Obama’s fault?  No, I don’t blame him in the least.  While his policies and ideas fall astonishingly short when it comes to inspiring our society, and make achieving the American dream more difficult for everyone – there are nearly 300 million other Americans who are still working to achieve that dream despite the failings of our elected leaders.  Yes, there is an official ‘8.4%’ unemployment rate which doesn’t account for the so called ‘underemployed’ or those who have simply stopped looking for work… but that also means that at least 90% of us are fully employed, and moving forward despite the action or inaction of our Government.

One of the big campaign slogans of the day is a question… “Are you better off today than you were 4 years ago?”

Truth be told, I am.  Sure, I’m in debt up to my ears.  Sure, I’m in the middle of a divorce.  But I’m a homeowner, drive a 3 year old car, have a full time job that pays my bills, and most importantly a work ethic that has taught me the value of earning what I have, and what I want, without expecting someone else to give it to me.  There are no cheat codes in life like in a video game.  I can’t wave my hands in the air and immediately wipe out my debt, or increase the value of my bank account.  I have to work for it.  If some blessing comes along the way – I don’t stop to think that it happened because of some government program, or because some politician kept a promise to cut my taxes… I stop to thank a higher power – God if you will – for letting me live in a place that despite so much hardship still allows me the opportunity to succeed and improve my lot in life if I am willing to do whatever is necessary to make it happen.

I don’t look to Government for solutions or answers.  I look to Government to keep the bad guys from taking my ass out when I’m in my office, flying, driving, or just walking down the street.  I look to my government to for no purpose other than to protect the freedoms granted to me by a higher authority.  Our Government, for as long as it has been in existence, has never gotten smaller.  It has never taken less.  It has grown to its current size and weight, built up such an astonishing amount of debt, limited our freedom, taken actions which inhibit (but not eliminate) our ability to work and earn and achieve our dreams – because we let it.  I don’t know when the shift took place, maybe it has been this way all along, but it started somewhere…  Someone, somewhere thought that there was a shortcut, a cheat code, a way to cut a few corners to make their dream come true… and that my friends began a near viral infection of the idea that Government is the highest authority in the land and it – not ourselves – is solely responsible for whether we sink or swim in this life of ours.

Things are the way they are, not because of the Government, not because of Barack Obama and his gaggle of elitist peckerheads, its because of us.  It’s because we have collectively forgotten that our destiny is decided by the choices we make and the actions we take.  There’s nobody to blame for the current state of our nation other than ourselves.  No one American can right the course of our country if we aren’t willing to stand up and do it ourselves.  We have just as much opportunity to hand our freedoms over to an all powerful bureaucracy as we have to stand up and take them back.

Lets say for a minute that all Republicans are racist, woman hating, close minded bible thumping idiots and all Democrats are lazy, drug addicted, homosexual Communists.  Good, now that we’ve gotten that out of the way…

What the fuck are YOU going to do with YOUR life?  It’s time to shit or get off the pot people.  Make the first thought you have when you wake up in the morning “What can I do to make today MY day?” You do that, and you take the actions necessary to make any day YOUR day, and you’ll see that there are more important things in life than waiting for your life to start.  Make it happen.  No Democrat or Republican can stand in your way if you don’t let them.  No government can stand in your way if you don’t let it.  There are 23 million reasons in this country to get of your ass, and unless you want to be number 23,000,001 – today is a good day to start.

I’m going to vote for Romney and Ryan – because when it comes to those 23,000,000 reasons to get off your ass, I think they’re going to be the ones that can put enough foot to ass so that maybe enough people will only need 1 reason… themselves.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Where’s the Tea Party? Barack Obama just got this Conservative’s vote.

So last night I tuned in to the coverage of the RNC via my Xbox again, and I have to say – the coverage provided by NBC was some of the best I had seen… as long as it was the non-prime time coverage that had no commentators there to spin the Liberal talking points and disenfranchise speakers who happened to be female (as in using coverage of the rain showers in Louisiana to pre-empt the first few minutes of Condoleeza Rice’s speech, and completely ignoring another female speaker in favor a morose discussion of inane crap by the fossilized pundits of NBC).

I’ll also say – from an objective point of view – Paul Ryan’s speech was an absolute knockout.  We’re not talking about content here – we’re talking about delivery – he had a message to deliver and he did it very well.

The big story here though is the blatant and downright disgusting disenfranchisement of the grassroots Conservative movement by the Republican establishment in charge of the RNC.  The big networks seem to be ignoring the story that even Sarah Palin (love her or hate her, she’s a valid voice of the Conservative movement) blew her stack about during an interview.  This is the thing that has always irritated me about the mainstream media – aside from their lock-step spin favoring the Left – you get a real good example of the Republican party fucking up exponentially – and instead of reporting on THAT – they stick to the talking points of Todd Akin, Hurricane Isaac, etc…

Basically what happened here is that the RNC made some rule changes which allows them to replace a state’s delegates to the convention on the fly and without contest.  There’s video footage out there today of the ‘yay’ or ‘nay’ votes which passed the rule changes with a loud YAY from some and a deafening NAY from just about everyone else.  The NAY’s came from true Conservatives, and they were blatantly ignored by the audience.

Now the people who are only complaining that this was deliberately done to keep Ron Paul from speaking aren’t seeing the big picture.  Ron Paul not being able to speak, or not getting a nomination was a side effect.  We didn’t nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki just to get a postage stamp 60 years later commemorating the attack.  Ron Paul was collateral damage.  This move had less to do with Ron Paul than it did with the establishment drawing a line in the sand and handing the real grassroots Conservatives their hat.  This move was made by people who most likely aren’t on the friends list of the Tea Party’s facebook page.  This move was made by a deep rooted political establishment that is no better in my humble opinion than the ones who helped Barack Obama get elected and further the deterioration of our constitutional republic in favor of increased government control at every level.

This rule change, and the despicable actions taken by the RNC in order to enact it are no different than the millions of us whose voices were silenced and ignored as Obama’s health care laws were passed.  There’s a war in this country, today, and it is between the people and those in our government ALIGNED WITH EITHER PARTY who are more concerned with maintaining their power and their privilege instead of preserving, protecting, and defending the American way of life.

What fries my gonads more is that apparently officials behind the Romney and Ryan campaign were complicit.  Now does this mean Romney and Ryan were directly involved in the decision?  Perhaps.  After this play though, I almost think that the ability of the Tea Party and the grassroots Conservative movement to directly affect the outcomes of enough elections to change the majority in the House of Representatives could have been calculated from the get go.  It was either that the establishment had been caught off guard by the efficiency with which they were attacked, or they were behind it from the start just to allow us to THINK we could regain control of our government.

My own decision to vote for the Romney/Ryan ticket was more because they weren’t Obama than because I truly believed they were Conservative.  I decided that they would cut the rate of how quickly our nation goes to hell in a handbasket.  Right now though, I can tell you with absolute conviction that if neither Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan come out against this disgraceful action and not only overturn it but also politically eviscerate the officials involved in its creation and passing – in November of 2012 I will cast my vote, as a life long Conservative, for Barack Obama.

Obama disgusts me.  The direction he is taking this country in is horrifying.  His arrogance and elitism makes me sick.  I will vote for him.

I will vote for Barack Obama because at least if I vote for him, I know what I am getting myself in to.  I will not cast my vote to support an establishment which has corrupted the Conservative movement.  I would rather see the party go down in flames than carry on the same old establishment bullshit that allowed Bush 43 to start a deficit cascade and explosion in the size and strength of our Federal Government which just about guaranteed the ascendancy of Barack Obama to the highest office in the land, and made it even easier for him to continue the policies of Bush 43 as well as build upon them.

I will not vote for Romney/Ryan because unless they prove otherwise pretty damned quick – they aren’t Conservatives, and I will not support them in the name of the Conservative movement.  Not Romney.  Not Ryan.  NOT IN MY NAME.  Barack Obama, you’ve got my vote.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

The 2012 Republican National Convention Has Begun…~yawn~

Ok, I’ll say it now to get it out of the way – I’m a registered Conservative, and in November I’ll be voting for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan.  No, I’m not completely sold, but I believe that generally they will be capable of improving our current economic crisis as well as put an end to Obama’s efforts at transforming the US of A into ‘just another former British colony.’

Thankfully, the NBC News app on my Xbox 360 offered a live stream of the event – and for the first hour or two did so without inane commentary from the incurably indoctrinated meat sacks at NBC news.  A lot of the speeches were from successful business owners in the US who built their businesses from the ground up with a steady series of jabs at Obama’s “You didn’t build that” remark (which was also replayed in its entirety as to mitigate the expected ‘playing it out of context’ attacks).

I do like that there was such a strong focus on Americans building a business and realizing the “American Dream” from scratch through desire, hard work, and sacrifice.  That’s something which I think has been lost on much of the current generation… the generation that will see others enjoying the benefits of hard work… that wants to enjoy those benefits as well… but either does not realize or flat out ignores just how much time and effort was required to get there.

Several speeches were made, the weakest of which IMHO was by Ted Cruz who is running for the Senate in Texas… a lot of cliche, famous quotes, and completely scripted pauses for applause (that wasn’t quite rousing at least from my POV).  To me, he came off more as plastic than passionate.

A side note – I’m not sure exactly how many folks were in the crowd at the convention yesterday – but it seemed that there was a lot of focus on the speakers and the stage and while the place did appear packed from the limited pans through the crowd, and that the feedback from the crowd (cheers, applause) was overly subdued.  This is something I’m going to keep in mind when I watch the 2012 Democrat National Convention… because I’m going to fire off a guess here that there will be tons of cameras on the crowd, and that the applause will be near deafening.  Call me a tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist here, but with NBC in charge of airing the event – I wouldn’t be surprised if the folks at the control boards did this on purpose… meaning that the audio levels from the crowd were deliberately lowered in order to make it appear that they just weren’t that “in to” what was going on.  I surely wouldn’t put it past NBC to pull such a shenanigan.

Eventually the ‘big show’ portion of the convention began, with broadcast dinosaurs like Brian Williams and Tom Brokenjaw (Brokaw) commenting.  At the onset, Williams had a face to face with Marco Rubio where he repeatedly tried to steer the discussion towards how Rubio felt about the “language” of the convention as well as the fiasco stirred up by Todd Akin.  The efforts were poorly executed and obvious to the point that I almost felt bad for Williams as well as NBC for blowing an opportunity to actually ask legitimate questions of Rubio in what was a blatant attempt at fishing for soundbites that could be used to illustrate a rift between the party and one of its all stars.  In stark contrast, Rubio handled the half-assed effort like a pro – a pro who knows how the mainstream media works and absolutely refused to play into their game.

Anne Romney seemed alright, even though at least initially (and at a few spots during her speech) – it wasn’t so much that she seemed insincere but she definitely needs to work on her delivery.  A majority of her speech focused on her relationship with Mitt, as well as stumping for him and his plans.  She definitely came off as ‘first lady’ material, and didn’t creep me out like Laura Bush or Michelle Obama did.

Definite high points were the speeches by Scott Walker of Wisconsin who highlighted the achievements and successes of his efforts in Wisconsin, and of course Chris Christie who had the keynote and also touted his successes in the Garden State while stumping for the party platform as well as Mitt Romney.

Overall I believe the message was delivered, but beyond the speeches given by ordinary Americans who built successful business and the current all-stars of the party who highlighted the success of their Conservative ideas, it seemed reserved – but genuine.  In contrast, I’m sure that the DNC will likely be an all out party from day 1 full of softball questions, character assassinations, and the false sense of substance we’ve all grown accustomed to over the past 4 years.

What I can say though is that if the Republicans are hoping to steer more votes their way – they need to take a page from the DNC playbook and back up their substance with a bit more flash.  “Stuffy, but genuine” isn’t going to cut it.

NBC’s Brian Williams Obnoxiously Presses Rubio About GOP’s ‘Rape Debate’

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

It’s not selling because you’re charging too much… no pun intended.

GM Said to Halt Chevrolet Volt Production for Four Weeks

If you ever wanted a metaphor of what is wrong with the current state of our country – it’s the Chevy Volt.

Originally, it was touted as a car whose gasoline engine would only run in order to keep the electric motors running.  In the end, it turned out to be just another hybrid, only with a price-point that could put you behind the wheel of a more proven hybrid such as the Toyota Prius – with just about every single option available.

Even the Chevy site which offers a ‘compare’ option that puts the Volt up side by side with its competitors lacks a key component – gas mileage.  Not to mention, looking at the list of competitors that are offered, the only car which comes close in cost to the Volt is the Nissan Leaf.  In fact, you could get a ‘competitively equipped’ Lexus Hybrid for $10k less.  When I look at the list they’ve provided, it almost encourages me to look elsewhere.

Now I won’t say that the Volt is a bad car – in actuality is a technical achievement for Chevrolet.  That said, Toyota accomplished the same 15 years ago and has spent the time since refining the car into an affordable reality for most buyers.  That’s easily one of the contributing factors involved in GM going belly up to the extent it needed a government bailout to rescue its unions it.

Another big problem with the Volt, besides the fact that it lacks the cult following of the Prius, as well as the price point of the Lexus, is that to achieve the fuel efficiency that has been touted since day one – there are restrictions on how you use the car.  Take a Prius on a short trip, or a long commute – there’s no question as to the mileage you’ll get.  The only way you can get 100mpg from a Volt is if you drive it less than 50 miles per day and fully charge it at night.  Travel beyond the limits of its EV only range and your fuel efficiency will drop into the mid 30’s as far as miles per gallon.  Still good mileage, but not for a car costing $40k.

What we’ve got here is history repeating itself.  During the oil crisis of the 1970s, Japanese automakers and their fuel efficient products absolutely pimp-smacked Detroit and their thirsty V8 driven catalog.  Even when fuel prices started to rise dramatically, the most fuel efficient Chevy you could buy was a brand-engineered and re-badged econobox from the Pacific Rim.  Given the choice between an Aveo or a Civic – which would you have picked?

Now with Chevy stopping production on the Volt again because it hasn’t reached the sales numbers they expected – who knows what is next for them.  Personally, being a shareholder under duress, I think they need to continue refining the car and get the price point down by about 50%.  Sure, they’ll take it on the nose, but one thing we know about General Motors is that operating at a loss is nothing new to them.  If they decide to make the same decision as when they scrapped the EV1 in 1999 (which came out at the same time as the original Prius) I can guarantee that whether or not they actually pay off the loans stolen from my tax dollars – they’re going to end up right back where they started.

My biggest problem with all of the American manufacturers, besides Ford, is that they’ve got the attention span of a goldfish.  Instead of creating the best car possible, they create an OK car and slap different levels of trim and options across multiple brands, then try to save money by eliminating the brands that aren’t selling well (see Plymouth, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, etc…) instead of realizing like the rest of us that IT’S THE CARS, STUPID.  They stretch out the life-cycle of their products to minimize cost and maximize profit, all the while not taking the opportunity to innovate.

They give us the Chevy Volt, or make it so their cars can run on Ethanol as well as gasoline while the rest of the worlds manufacturers focus on stronger, lighter materials and more efficient drive-trains.  Imagine where Chevrolet could be today if in 1999 instead of putting the most technologically advanced creation they had into the crusher they decided to add the engine from a Chevy Cavalier to it?

There has always been a market for fuel efficient vehicles, and until Chevy starts taking that market seriously – they’re always going to be lagging behind the rest of the world…instead of leading it.

 

Posted in Driving | Leave a comment